International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR)

Full Html


IJCRR - Vol 09 issue 03, February

Pages: 28-33

Date of Publication: 10-Feb-2017


Print Article   Download XML  Download PDF

Knowledge and Practices of Caretakers About Immunization Among Children Aged 12 - 23 Months of Rural block Gudamalani, District Barmer (Rajasthan)

Author: Choudhary Bhagraj1, Solanki S. L.2, S. M. Yadav3

Category: Healthcare

Abstract:Background: Immunization done in childhood period almost guarantees protection from many vaccine preventable diseases. It prevents 2 million deaths per year worldwide and is rightly considered to be 'overwhelmingly good 'preventive tool by the scientific community. Uptake of vaccination as per national immunization schedule is dependent not only on provision of health services but also on other factors including knowledge and attitude of mothers.
Objectives:
1. To determine immunization coverage of infants according to EPI.
2. To access the knowledge of caretakers of infants aged 12 \? 23 months regarding immunization.
Materials and Methods: It was a cross-sectional study conducted from October 2016 to December 2016, included 210 caretakers and 210 infants of 12-23 months old selected by applying the 30 × 7 cluster sampling method in block Gudamalani of district Barmer. Only one infant was included from each caretaker.
Results: Out of total 210 subjects, 111 (52.85%) were males and rest 99 (47.15%) females. BCG was administered to 106 (95.49%) of males and 85 (85.85%) of females, DPT III to 83 (74.77%) of males and 70 (70.70%) of females and Measles to 149 (70.96%) of the total subjects. The dropout rates in both the gender was observed maximum in BCG to Measles (23.58 in males and 20.00 in females) followed by DPT \? I to DPT \? III (16.16 in males to 9.75 in females). Knowledge about the correct age of vaccination for Measles, BCG, DPT, OPV were 26.67%, 21.43%, 18.57% and 12.85% of the study subjects respectively. Fever (54.28%), swelling (74.76%), redness (60.95%) on thigh after DPT emerged as main side effects of vaccination. Measles (86.19%) and Polio (65.24%) were the most commonly heard diseases, among the vaccine preventable diseases.
Conclusion: Though the coverage rate for vaccine preventable diseases was good in our study, but still there is a need to increase the immunization coverage among the infants, so that not a single child remains unimmunized. Since the infants are vulnerable to infections towards vaccine preventable diseases (VPDs), it necessitates for collection of the data on the knowledge, and practices of the caretakers with respect to different aspects of immunization.

Keywords: Fever, Measles, Vaccine preventable diseases, Side effects

Full Text:

Introduction

“The child is a God’s gift to the family. Each child is created in the special image and likeness of God for greater affection, to love and to be loved.”

In the last 50 years, it was observed that immunization has saved the lives of more children than any other medical intervention. Immunization is one of the best indicators to evaluate the health outcomes and services distributed across various socio - economic groups to prevent a series of major illnesses. According to the NFHS-3 in India, the percentage of immunization increased from 36.0% in (1992), to 42.0% in (1998) and further to 44.0% in (2005) of the children in age one to two years.  But it is still, very less than to the desired goal of achieving 85.0% coverage (1). Immunization practices are particularly much valuable in environment where children are undernourished and die from vaccine preventable diseases. Vaccines are safe, simple and cost-effective ways to save and improve the lives of children. Knowing the extensive benefits of immunization, further any imbalances in knowledge, attitude and practices shall be a cause of serious policy concern. Uptake of vaccination services is dependent on provision of the services as well as on other factors including knowledge and attitude of mothers and density of health workers.

The most important factors influencing the attitudes of caretakers was considered to be the cultural receptivity perceived modernity and education, as well as the trust in health workers. 

Immunization is a key strategy to achieve the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) especially to reduce the under-5 mortality rate (U5MR), infant mortality rate (IMR) and proportion of child immunized against measles.

Ever since the launch of EPI in 1978 & UIP in 1985 with promotion through CSSM program & RCH in 1997, there has been considerable progress in control of vaccine preventable diseases, but in spite of the progress every year a large number of children continue to be affected with VPD's.

It is estimated that every year, at least 27 million children and 40 million pregnant women worldwide do not receive the basic package of immunization (as defined by the WHO and UNICEF), and 2 to 3 million people die from vaccine preventable diseases. Around 10 million children under the age of five years die every year and over 27 million infants in the world do not get the coverage of full routine immunization. In the developing world, it does not only prevent about 3 million child death per year but also has the potential to avert additional 2 million deaths if immunization programmes are expanded and fully implemented(2). The accurate measurement of vaccination coverage is an essential step in determining the expected reductions in morbidity and mortality from VPDs. Although the immunization coverage has increased substantially in the recent years but  the children aged 12 - 23 months in urban India; only 60% were fully immunized which is less than the desired goal of achieving 85%coverage. Immunization status varies widely across regions, states, strata’s of the society due to socio – demographic factors and availability of health care.

Objectives of the study

  1. To determine immunization coverage of infants according to EPI.
  2. To access the knowledge of caretakers of the infants aged 12 – 23 months regarding immunization.

Methodology

This is a cross-sectional household based study included 210 caretakers and 210 infants of 12-23 months old selected by applying the 30 × 7 cluster sampling method in block Gudamalani of Barmer district with the desired precision of ± 10% and expected coverage of 85% as proposed by WHO(3). House-to-house visits and face-to face interviews were conducted on a pre-tested   proforma after taking the  consent from the caretakers. Only one caretaker was selected for each infant. Knowledge about vaccine with the site of injection was assessed.

Complete Immunization - Child who has received three doses of DPT, Hepatitis B and OPV each, and one dose of BCG and Measles each.

Partial Immunization - A child who had missed any one or more of the above doses

No Immunization - A child who had not received even a single dose of any vaccine

Drop Out Rate – DPT I coverage – DPT III coverage /DPT I coverage ×100

Results:

In total 210 subjects, males were 111 (52.85%) and 99 (47.15%) females. It was observed that 149 (70.96%) infants were completely immunized and 50 (23.80%) had partial immunization while 11 (5.24%) were not immunized with any vaccine. The percentage of males was higher, (72.97%) among fully immunized children whereas female subjects was higher in both partial (24.24%) and non-immunized (7.07%) subjects. (Table 1)

BCG was administered to 191 (90.95%) of the subjects of which 106 (95.49%) were males and 85 (85.85%) females, whereas OPV – 0 dose was administered to 196 (93.33%) subjects. DPT III was administered to 83 (74.77%) of males and 70 (70.70%) of females. Three doses of Hepatitis B were administered to 84 (75.67%) of males and 70 (70.71%) of females. Measles was administered to 81 (72.97%) of males and (68.68%) of females. (Table 2)

The dropout rates in both the gender was observed maximum in BCG to measles (23.58 in males and 20.00 in females) followed by DPT – I to DPT – III was (16.16 in males to 9.75 in females).  Further for BCG to DPT it was (6.60 in males and 3.52 in females) , for Hepatitis B – III  to Measles  (3.57 in males and 2.94 in females), and  lowest for DPT – III to Measles (2.40 in males to 2.85 in females). (Table 3)

When the knowledge of care-givers regarding the various aspects of routine immunization accessed, it was seen that only 30.95% of care-givers knew that children less than five years of age are the candidates for routine immunization under national immunization schedule (NIS). In this study, 57.61% of caretakers  had heard for tuberculosis, 86.19% for polio, 24.28%for diphtheria, 18.57% for pertussis, 31.42% for tetanus, 6.67% for Hepatitis B and 65.24% for measles among the vaccine preventable diseases. Knowledge about the correct age for vaccination was 21.43% for BCG and 26.67% Measles, 18.57% DPT, 5.23% Hepatitis B, and 12.85% for OPV.  Among the caretakers, 63.33% had the correct knowledge for three doses of DPT, to be given up to the age of one year. Contra-indications of any vaccines were stated as fever (46.67%), cough and cold (45.24%) and diarrhoea (33.33%). fever (54.28%) and the main side effects of vaccination emerged as swelling (74.76%) redness (60.95%) on thigh after DPT.(Table 4)

Discussion:

The main factors for children not being fully immunized and low coverage of immunization may be the lack of knowledge or awareness about the importance of prevention of VPDs and ‘not aware of the needs of vaccination’ as well as the inadequacy of community participation. Therefore keeping every factor in mind the present study was carried out with the objectives of assessing the knowledge of routine child immunization among care-givers of 12 to 23 months old children, finding out the coverage of all the vaccines among the recipients.

In the present study, the subjects were 52.85% males and 47.15% females. These results are similar to study by (4), (5), (6)(51.9%, 58.6%, 53.8% males, and 48.1%, 41.4%, 46.2% females) respectively.

In our study out of 210 infants, 70.96% were fully immunized while 23.80% partially and only 5.24% were non - immunized. Similar results of 72.23% completely immunized and 4.64% non - immunized, were observed in a study by (7)and in another study (8), 73.3% fully immunized and 2.8% non-immunized.   In study by (9),(6),   a very high 95.0% and 86.67% of complete immunization was observed, whereas (10), (11) observed 69.3% and 60.8%, and, while, the study      (10) observed only 44.85% of complete immunization.  (Table 1)

We observed 90.95% of infants immunized with the BCG which are comparable to 94.75% by(8)89.1% by (5)    and 86.5% by (12) while higher results (98.75%)were observed by (6). In our study we observed DPT – I in 86.19% and DPT – II in 78.57% which is comparable with (12)(84.2% DPT – I and 82.2% DPT – II. Measles vaccine was administered in our study in 149 (70.96%) which is also comparable to 78.3% by (12) whereas study by (6) observed high results 87.62%. (Table 2)

The dropout rate for DPT I to DPT III was 16.02 which is quite comparable to a study 18.0 by (13),(14) and 15 by (8) while dropout rate for DPT I to Measles was 2.40 for males and 2.85 for females, which is much less than the study by (6) 4.72% and 8.79% respectively.(Table 3)

To achieve maximum benefit, it is necessary that immunization coverage should uniformly reach to all levels of society for all vaccine preventable diseases. This requires prompt effort on provision of immunization services and optimum utilization of these services by the target population.    Mothers of under-five children are the main target as care givers for childhood immunization and so needed to be significantly aware of the services and benefits of immunization. It requires knowledge about the vaccination, the appropriate age of vaccination along with the impact of morbidity and mortality of vaccine preventable diseases with the    benefits and utilization of health services.

In our study, 30.95% of the care-givers knew that under-five children were the candidates for routine immunization, similar to 36.0% by (5).  Out of 210 study subjects, 78.57% referred  two diseases out of all vaccine preventable diseases correctly, similar to (9) (83.0%) in (16), 85%. In the present study 57.61% of the subjects, named tuberculosis, 24.28%  diphtheria, 18.57 %  pertussis and 65.24%  measles a VPD, similar to  study by (11) i.e.52.4% tuberculosis, 23.2% diphtheria, 17.3%  pertussis and 61.0% for measles.  In our study contra-indication for vaccination indicated by caretakers was 46.67% fever, 45.24% cough and cold and 18.57% diarrhoea, while in a study by (5)   it was 37.5% fever, 35.2% cough and cold, 24.8% diarrhoea. Study by (17) reported 24.0% fever, 41.0% for cold and 14.0% for diarrhoea for contra-indication.

In our study 63.33% care givers had the knowledge of three doses for DPT; similar to 60.0% by (17). (Table 4)

Conclusion:

Though the knowledge of the studied mothers about vaccination was not appropriate as reflected by the results of this study for achieving the Millennium Development Goals. It requires for strengthening of the efforts for aggressive campaigning, community involvement with dissemination of information for the success of the universal immunization programme. In this study we had gone through to know the existing levels of knowledge among the mothers and to assess the immunization practices in the areas needed for the improvement. Therefore it can be said that, IEC activities focused on immunization to be implemented sincerely with dense efforts for better coverage in areas with   incomplete immunization.

Acknowledgement

Authors acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars, whose articles are cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors/ editors/ publishers of all those articles, and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed.

Funding: No funding sources

Conflict of interest: None declared

Ethical approval: Approved by the Institutional ethics committee

References:

  1. Ministry of Health and Family Welfare Government of India. Introduction, child health, maternal health in National Family Health Survey (NFHS-III). Volume I. International institute for population Science Available at http://www.measuredhs.com/pubs/pdf/FRIND3/ 00FrontMatter00.pdf. Accessed on 02 December 2015.
  2. United States Agency for international Development, Immunization Programmes for healthy children. Immunization basics Available http://www.immunizationbasics.jsi.com/Accessed 31/12/2011.
  3. WHO 8.7.2008: the module for mid-level for managers: The EPI coverage survey WHO/IV B/08.07.08. Available from: http://www.who.int/immunization/documents/mlm/en/indx.html. (Last accessed on 2016 Jan 15).
  4. Trivedi R, Singh S, Adhikari P, Jatav DP. Coverage evaluation of primary immunization and the associated determinants in an urban slum of Rewa. Ind J Comm Health. 2014;26(1):37-40.
  5. Mandal S, Gandhari Basu, Rahul Kirtania, Suman Kumar Roy; Care Giver’s Knowledge and Practice On Routine Immunization among 12 -23 months children in a Rural Community of West Bengal; IOSR Journal of Dental and Medical Sciences (IOSR-JDMS) e-ISSN: 2279-0853, p-ISSN: 2279-0861. Volume 6, Issue 6 (May.- Jun. 2013), PP 105-111 www.iosrjournals.org
  6. Gupta PK, Pore P, Patil U. Evaluation of immunization coverage in the rural area of Pune, Maharashtra, using the 30 cluster sampling technique. J Fam Med Primary Care 2013;2:50-4.
  7. Bhatia V, Swami HM, Rai S, Gulati S, Verma A, Prashar A, Kumar R. Immuniztion status in children. Indian J. Pediatrics. 2004;71(4):313-315.
  8. Yadav S, Mangal S, Padhiyar N, Mehta JP, Yadav B.S. Evaluation of Immunization Coverage in Urban Slums of Jamnagar City. Indian Journal of Community Medicine. 2006;31(4):300-301.
  9. Tagbo BN, ND Uleanya, IC Nwokoye, JC Eze, IB Omotowo. Mothers’ knowledge, perception and practice of childhood immunization in Enugu. Niger J Paed 2012;39 (3):90 – 96.
  10. Kar M, Reddaiah VP, Kant S. primary Immunization status of children in Slum areas of South Delhi- the challenge of reaching Urban poor . Indian Journal of Community Medicine 2001;26(3):151-154.
  11. Yadav RJ, Singh P. Immunization status of children and mothers in the state of Madhya Pradesh. Indian Journal of Community Medicine.2004;29(3):147-148.
  12. Abrol A, A Galhotra, N Agarwal, A Bala, N Goel. Immunization Status In A Slum In Chandigarh (U.T) India: A Perspective To Enhance The Service. The Internet Journal of Health  2008 Volume 8 Number 2
  13. Pragati Chhabra, Parvathy Nair, Anita Gupta, Meenakshi S Sandhir and A. T. Kannan. Immunization in Urabanized Villages of Delhi. Indian journal of Community Medicine, Vol. 74 – February, 2007, Page no. 131 – 134.
  14. Suresh K, Saxena D. Trends and Determinants of Immunization Coverage in India. Journal of Indian Medical Association.2000; 98(1):10-14.
  15. Nath B, J. V. Singh, Shallyawasthi*, Vidyabhushan, Vishwajeetkumar**, S. K. Singh ; a study on determinants of immunization coverage among 12-23 months old children in urban slums of lucknow district, india; indian j med sci, vol. 61, no. 11, November 2007..
  16. Roos M. Bernsen, Fatmah R. Al-Zahmi, Noura A. Al-Ali et al. Knowledge, Attitude and Practice towards Immunizations among Mothers in a Traditional City in the United Arab Emirates Journal of Medical Sciences (2011); 4(3): 114-121
  17. Singh M.C., Badole CM and Singh MP. Immunization coverage and the knowledge and practice of mothers regarding immunization in rural area. The Indian Journal of Public Health.1994;38(3):103-7.