International Journal of Current Research and Review (IJCRR)

Full Html


IJCRR - Vol 09 Issue 05, March

Pages: 17-21

Date of Publication: 20-Mar-2017


Print Article   Download XML  Download PDF

New Intuitionistic Fuzzy Similarity Measures and Application to Pattern Recognition

Author: Anshu Ohlan

Category: General Sciences

Abstract:Aim: The aim of the paper is to introduce three new intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures. Methodology: To achieve the goal of this paper, an exponential methodology is used with three different functions. The important properties of the proposed measures are discussed axiomatically.
Results: The applicability and efficiency of these new similarity measures in pattern recognition are demonstrated with illustrative examples. It is shown that the proposed measures are efficient, reasonable and simpler than the existing measures.
Conclusion: The proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures are consistent for the application point of view in the context of pattern recognition

Keywords: Fuzzy set, Intuitionistic fuzzy set, Intuitionistic fuzzy divergence measure, Intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measure

Full Text:

INTRODUCTION

The notion of fuzzy set introduced by Zadeh [1] has acknowledged a central attention from researchers for its useful applications in various fields such as pattern recognition, image processing, speech recognition, bioinformatics, fuzzy aircraft control, feature selection, decision making, etc. Zadeh [2] presented the concept of entropy, as a measure of uncertainty. In 1972, De Luca and Termini [3] introduced an axiomatic structure of fuzzy entropy measure based on Shannon [4] entropy. In the past decades, literature on fuzzy and intuitionistic fuzzy measures of information and their generalizations are significantly extended by the different researchers [5-23].

            The idea of Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy sets (IFSs) was first invented by Atanassov [24-27] which found to be well suited to deal with both fuzziness and lack of knowledge or non-specificity. It is noticed that the concept of an IFS is the best alternative approach to define a fuzzy set (FS) in cases where existing information is not enough for the definition of imprecise concepts by mean of a conventional FS. Therefore, the concept of Atanassov IFSs is the generalization of the concept of FSs. In 1993, Gau and Buehrer [28] initiated the concept of vague sets. But, Bustince and Burillo [29] presented that the idea of vague sets was the same to that of Atanassov IFSs. As a very significant content in intuitionistic fuzzy mathematics, the study on the similarity measure between IFSs has established more attention in recent years. Similarity measure between IFSs has been extended by many researchers in last decades. Initially, Dengfeng and Chuntian [30] presented the axiomatic definition of similarity measures between IFSs A and B given by

Liang and Shi [31] revealed some counter-intuitive cases resulting from the measures provided by Dengfeng and Chuntian [30] and then presented a number of similarity measures to overcome those cases are as

Hung and Yang [32] implemented the Hausdorff distance for developing similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Thereafter, many researchers [33-43], provided the definitions of similarity measures between IFSs.

Although there exist several similarity measures of between IFSs, it is expected to have efficient similarity measures which deal with the aspect of uncertainty, that is, fuzziness and non specificity or lack of knowledge and also deals with the real world problems. Briefly motivated by the above mentioned work, in this paper, we relate the exponential approach on IFSs and propose three similarity measures between two IFSs.

                The rest of the paper is organized as follows. Methodology section is devoted to review briefly some well-known concepts related to fuzzy set theory and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory. In results section we introduce three new similarity measure between IFSs with the proof of their validity. The application of the proposed similarity measures in pattern recognition is presented in discussion section.  Final section concludes the paper.

METHODOLOGY

We begin by reviewing some well-known concepts related to fuzzy set theory and intuitionistic fuzzy set theory.

 

Definition 1. Fuzzy Set (FS) [1]: A fuzzy set A' defined on a finite universe of discourse  is given as:

            

where  is the membership function of A'. The membership value describes the degree of the belongingness of is valued in {0, 1}, it is the characteristic function of a crisp i.e., non-fuzzy set.

Definition 2. Intuitionistic Fuzzy Set (IFS) [24-27]: An Atanassov intuitionistic fuzzy set (IFS) on a finite universe of discourse  is defined as

  with the condition

The numbers  denote the degree of membership and non-membership of X1 to X2, respectively.

            For each intuitionistic fuzzy set inX we will callthe intuitionistic index or degree of hesitation of Xi in A. It is obvious that  for each . For a fuzzy set,  . Thus, FSs are the special cases of IFSs.

Atanassov [26] further defined set operations on intuitionistic fuzzy sets as follows:

Hung and Yang [32], Tan and Chen [44] and Chen and Chang [45] adopt the following properties for the validity of a measure to be an intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measure as:

RESULTS

It is well known that distance and similarity measure are dual concepts. Therefore, we may use the distance measure  introduced by Ohlan [6] to propose the new similarity measures as

Thus we may define one of similarity measure between IFSs A and B using the exponential operation as follows:

                            

On the other hand we may define one more new similarity measure as:

                                                                                                           

Theorem 1. The defined measures (3)-(5) between IFSs  and are valid measures of similarity between intuitionistic fuzzy sets :

Proof: Let us assume  f  be a monotonic decreasing function and since

consequently, we have  and all the other properties will also hold for a monotonic decreasing function.

Now we have to select a useful and reasonable f for each case.

(i) Let us first assume f as , then the similarity measure defined in (3) is well-defined and also satisfies all the properties of a valid measure of similarity between IFSs given in methodology section.

(ii) Now we choose the exponential function , from which we can say that the measure  , is well-defined in view of definition provided above.  

(iii) On the other hand, if we choose the function f as , for which the similarity measure (5)  is also defined in view of definition already given in methodology section.

Hence, in view of definition of Hung and Yang [32], Tan and Chen [44] and Chen and Chang [45] provided above in Methodology section, the three intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures (3)-(5) are valid measures of similarity measures.

DISCUSSION

 We now demonstrate the efficiency of proposed three intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures in Pattern Recognition by considering the example of Liu [37], Vlachos and Sergiadis [46], Yen [42] and Farhadinia [47].

Example 1

Let  and three known patterns P1,P2 and P3 which have classifications C1, C2 and C3  respectively are represented by the following IFSs,

            ,

where for 

we have an unknown pattern represented by IFS

our aim here is to classify to one of the classes C1, C2 and C3. In order to proceed we use the criteria

 

From the calculated numerical values of different proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures from (3) - (5) given in Table 1, it is observed that the pattern  should be classified to The results are exactly matching with that obtained in Liu [37], Yen [42] and Farhadinia [47].

Example 2

Given three known patterns P1, P2 and P3  which have classifications C1, C2 and C3 respectively. These are represented by the following IFSs in the universe of discourse

where for

we have an unknown pattern  represented by IFS

our aim is to classify to one of the classes and . In order to proceed we use the criteria

From the computed numerical values of different proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures from (3) - (5) given in Table 2, it is observed that the pattern  should be classified to . Thus, the proposed intuitionistic fuzzy similarity measures are consistent for the application point of view in the context of pattern recognition.

CONCLUSION

Despite the fact that many similarity measures between IFSs have been developed in past years, still there is a good scope that the better similarity measures can be developed, which will have useful applications in the variety of fields. In this paper, we have proposed three new information-theoretic similarity measures for IFSs with the proof of their validity. The efficiency and consistency of these new similarity measures in the context of pattern recognition are presented with help of examples.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Authors acknowledge the immense help received from the scholars whose article cited and included in references of this manuscript. The authors are also grateful to authors/editors/publishers of all those articles, journals and books from where the literature for this article has been reviewed and discussed.

Conflict of interest: Nil

Source of Funding: Nil                                                  

References:

  1. L.A. Zadeh, Fuzzy sets, Information and Control 8(3) (1965), 338-353.
  2. L.A. Zadeh, Probability measures of fuzzy events, Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications 23(1968), 421-427.
  3. De Luca A. and Termini S.(1972), “A definition of non-probabilistic entropy in the setting of fuzzy set theory”, Information and Control, 20(4), 301-312.
  4. Shannon C.E.(1948), “The mathematical theory of communication”, The Bell System Technical Journal, 27(3), 379-423.
  5. Ohlan A.(2015),  “A new generalized fuzzy divergence measure and applications,” Fuzzy Information and Engineering, 7(4), 507-523.
  6. Ohlan A.(2016), “Intuitionistic fuzzy exponential divergence: application in multi-attribute decision making,” Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 30, 1519-1530.
  7. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures,”  Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  8. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Fundamentals of Fuzzy Information Measures, in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 1-22.
  9. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Parametric Generalized R-norm Fuzzy Information and Divergence Measures, in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 23-52.
  10. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Parametric Generalized Exponential Fuzzy Divergence Measure and Strategic Decision-Making, in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 53-69.
  11. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Sequence and Application of Inequalities Among Fuzzy Mean Difference Divergence Measures in Pattern Recognition in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 71-92.
  12. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Applications of Generalized Fuzzy Divergence Measure Multi-criteria Decision Making and Pattern Recognition in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 93-105.
  13. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), “Generalized Hellinger's Divergence Measure and Its Applications in Ohlan A. and Ohlan R., Generalizations of Fuzzy Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 107-121.
  14. Ohlan A. and Ohlan R.(2016), Intuitionistic  Fuzzy  Exponential  Divergence  and  Multi-attribute Decision-Making”,  in  Ohlan  A.  and  Ohlan  R.,  Generalizations  of  Fuzzy  Information Measures, Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 123-142.   
  15. Tomar V.P. and Ohlan A.(2014a), “Two new parametric generalized norm fuzzy information measures”, International Journal of Computer Applications 93(13), 22-27
  16. Tomar V.P. and Ohlan A.(2014b), “Sequence of fuzzy divergence measures and inequalities”, AMO - Advanced Modeling and Optimization, 16(2), 439-452.
  17. Tomar V.P. and Ohlan A.(2014c), “Sequence of inequalities among fuzzy mean difference divergence measures and their applications”, SpringerPlus, 3, 623, 1-20.
  18. Tomar V.P. and Ohlan A.(2014d), “New parametric generalized exponential fuzzy divergence measure,” Journal of Uncertainty Analysis and Applications, 2(1), 1-14.
  19. Ohlan A.(2016a), “Some Recent Developments on Probabilistic Information Measures,” International Journal of Innovative Research in Science, Engineering and Technology, 5(12), 20455-20460.
  20. Ohlan A.(2016b), “Overview on Development of Fuzzy Information Measures,” International Journal of All Research Education and Scientific Methods (IJARESM), 4(12), 17-22.
  21. Ohlan A.(2016c), “An Overview On Intuitionistic Fuzzy Similarity Measures,” International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science, 4(11), 192-198.
  22. Ohlan A.(2016d), “Generalized Exponential Fuzzy Information Measures,” International Journal of Advanced Technology in Engineering and Science, 4(12), 392-399.
  23. Ohlan A.(2016d), “Similarity Measures on Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets,” International Journal of Science Technology and Management, 5(12), 463-468.
  24. Atanassov K.T.(1986), “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 20, 87-96.
  25. Atanassov K.T.(1994), “New operations defined over the intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 61, 137-142.
  26. Atanassov K.T.(1999), “Intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Springer, Heidelberg.
  27. Atanassov K.T.(2000), “Two theorems for intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 110, 267-269.
  28. Gau W.L. and Buehrer D.J.(1993), “Vague sets”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 23, 610-614.
  29. Bustince H. and Burillo P.(1996), “Vague sets are intuitionisic fuzzy sets”, Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79, 403-405.
  30. Dengfeng L. and Chuntian C. (2002),“New similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets and application to pattern recognition,” Pattern Recogn. Lett., 23, 221-225.
  31. Liang, Z. and Shi, P., “Similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets,” Pattern Recogn. Lett., 24 (2003), 2687-2693.
  32. Hung W.L. and Yang M.S.(2004), “Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Hausdorff distance”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 25, 1603-1611.
  33. Wang W. Q. and Xin X. L.(2005), “Distance measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets”,  Pattern Recognition Letters, 26, 2063-2069.
  34. Park J.H., Park J.S., Kwun Y.C., Lim K.M.(2007), “New similarity measures on intuitionistic fuzzy sets", Fuzzy Information and Engineering Advances in Soft Computing, 40, 22-30.
  35. Mitchell H.B. (2003), “On the Dengfeng-Chuntian similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition", Pattern Recognition Letters, 24(16), 3101-3104.
  36. Julian P., Hung K.C., Lin S.J., (2012), “On the Mitchell similarity measure and its application to pattern recognition”, Pattern Recognition Letters,  33(9), 1219-1223.
  37. Liu H.W. (2005), “New similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and between elements”, Mathematical and Computing Modelling, 42(1-2), 61-70.
  38. Zhang C. and Fu H. (2006), “Similarity measures on three kinds of fuzzy sets”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(12), 1307-1317.
  39. Hung W.L., M.S. Yang (2007), “Similarity measures of intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on Lp metric”, International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 46(14), 120-136.
  40. Hung W.L. and Yang M.S. (2008), “On similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, International Journal of Intelligent Systems,  23(3), 364-383.
  41. Hung W.L. and Yang M.S.  (2008), “On the J-divergence of intuitionistic fuzzy sets with its applications to pattern recognition”, Information Sciences, 178(6), 1641-1650.
  42. Yen J. (2011), “Cosine similarity measures for intuitionistic fuzzy sets and their applications”, Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 53(1-2), 91- 97.
  43. Hwang C.M., Yang M.S.(2012), “Modified cosine similarity measure between intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, 4th International Conference, AICI 2012, 7530, 285-293, Chengdu, China, October 26-28.
  44. Tan C. and Chen X. (2014), “Dynamic similarity measures between intuitionistic fuzzy sets and its application”, international journal of fuzzy systems, 16(4), 511-519.
  45. Chen S.M. and Chang C.H. (2015), “A novel similarity between Atanassov's intuitionistic fuzzy sets based on transformation techniques with applications to pattern recognition”, Information Sciences, 291, 96-114.
  46. Vlachos I.K. and Sergiadis G.D.(2007), “Intuitionistic fuzzy information-application to pattern recognition”, Pattern Recognition Letters, 28(2), 197-206.
  47. Farhadinia B. (2014), “An efficient similarity measure for intuitionistic fuzzy sets”, Soft Computing, 18, 85-94.